Why 1080 24p




















I would tell the story about the purple aardvark but it might get me in trouble. Member since: Nov Is there a difference in displaying VS outputting? Depends of which output your displays accepts 24p, 60p, or 60i and of course what your player is capable of spitting out where the conversion is done, but yes you need a 24p output and a 24p display if you want film motion to be artifact free.

Originally Posted by Deciazulado. Member since: Sep You don't really need a Hz display. Just as long as your display can do p24, i60, or p30 is good enough for BD. Find More Posts by WriteSimply.

Originally Posted by WriteSimply. The other advantage of Hz is that 12, 15, 20, 24 30, 40, and 60 framerates all can be displayed without motion artifacts, important in a world full of different, mixed frame rates. Even 25 and 50 will have smaller or little judder, at that refresh rate. Originally Posted by PurpleAardvark. Their is no tv that can do p30 at the moment, only p24 and p Member since: Jun Is it possible that you just dont get any picture?

The player will also do 60i, and the 24p display will accept 60i and maybe 60p too. Sony XBR 2 or 3 LCD's will take a p24 signal with out converting as will the pioneer elite tv's can't rember the model number with out converting. However you are correct in saying that most p tvs are at 60hrz or 60fps. As time progresses you will see more p24 tv's come out, but for right now they have a hefty pricetag for thier size.

All times are GMT. The time now is AM. Archive - Top. United States. Remember New member Lost password. Home Theater. Best Blu-ray Movie Deals. Top deals New deals 12 13 14 15 16 Amazon Blu-ray. Have you ever posted something and later realized that was stupid not really stupid SInce I never had the varioous options before, it was a very simpple choice for me with the FX January 24th, , PM Ron Evans.

Sent back to Sony and eventually got the lens unit replaced and it is now reasonable. I now take a lot of care with focusing and really wish it had the spot focus of the consumer cameras and was as quick focusing. Things I like over the FX1 are the long record times with the FMU no tapes to worry about and the better audio control. DV Info Net refers all where-to-buy and where-to-rent questions exclusively to these trusted full line dealers and rental houses Your Name.

Remember Me? Mark Forums Read. Buyer's Guides. Thread Tools. January 24th, , AM. Mark A. This used to be because they were shot on film, though now it's more common they're shot on video that's made to look like film, and thus preserve the "film" framerate.

Not surprisingly, Blu-ray is typically p24, since nearly all the movie and TV show content is the same framerate. In fact, Blu-ray isn't even capable of p60, which is the most your TV can likely accept. There are a few exceptions here, too. As far as all this is concerned, it all makes a lot of sense: Movies are 24fps most TV shows too and these fit on Blu-ray, which was designed to handle the same framerate. All good, right? Generally speaking, if a TV or other display device showed you 24 frames per second, it would look really choppy.

Movie theaters can get away with it because the images are so dim usually a fraction of what your TV produces. If you were to display 24fps as 24fps on something as small and bright as your TV, it would flicker a lot.

Even theaters don't really show 24fps. They use a rotating shutter to throw a black frame in between each film frame. Sometimes these rotate at 48 or 72Hz, so you're seeing each frame two or three times, with black frames in between.

This is fast enough that you can't see it obviously. TVs run at 60Hz or 50Hz in some countries. To get 24fps to show on a TV that's technically doing 60fps, a method called pulldown is used. Here, the first film frame is shown twice, the second three times, the third two times, and so on.

With 50Hz generally the 24fps is sped up slightly, to 25fps, which fits nicely with 50Hz. The method works, technically, but it's not terribly pleasant. The result is a noticeably jerky motion whenever there's a camera pan, or horizontal motion on screen. With the increasing popularity of greater-thanHz displays, it's possible to do something about this jerkiness.

One of the first mainstream displays to offer a way to get rid of the was Pioneer's Kuro plasma, which could "refresh" at 72Hz, allowing for a cadence for more on how plasmas refresh, check out What is Hz. The result was much smoother, more film-like and natural motion. I, and many others, loved this.



0コメント

  • 1000 / 1000